<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remarks on Comments on Chapter 14, and a Concluding Note</title>
	<link>http://publicreason.net/2008/04/26/remarks-on-comments-on-chapter-14-and-a-concluding-note/</link>
	<description>a blog for political philosophers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon Cabulea May</title>
		<link>http://publicreason.net/2008/04/26/remarks-on-comments-on-chapter-14-and-a-concluding-note/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Cabulea May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://publicreason.net/2008/04/26/remarks-on-comments-on-chapter-14-and-a-concluding-note/#comment-629</guid>
		<description>I've also wanted to avoid signaling the end of the group by thanking everyone who has contributed and participated. I'm more convinced than ever that this kind of forum can generate high quality discussion of philosophical literature. Obviously, this has been an experimental semester, but I think it has been a remarkable first run for the website.

I will leave the link to the reading group schedule up on the front page, so that people who wish to catch up on the reading may post whatever comments they have in due course. I should add though that this should probably be done in the spirit of simply adding further thoughts rather than trying to continue a dialogue. 

I'm looking to set up two groups on two other books for autumn, as well as something else that I'll post on shortly that will either be a complete failure or something pretty neat (na ja). I'm not personally going to try to organise anything for the summer, but if anyone else does, the floor is open.

Thanks again to everyone, especially Dave and Jon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also wanted to avoid signaling the end of the group by thanking everyone who has contributed and participated. I&#8217;m more convinced than ever that this kind of forum can generate high quality discussion of philosophical literature. Obviously, this has been an experimental semester, but I think it has been a remarkable first run for the website.</p>
<p>I will leave the link to the reading group schedule up on the front page, so that people who wish to catch up on the reading may post whatever comments they have in due course. I should add though that this should probably be done in the spirit of simply adding further thoughts rather than trying to continue a dialogue. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking to set up two groups on two other books for autumn, as well as something else that I&#8217;ll post on shortly that will either be a complete failure or something pretty neat (na ja). I&#8217;m not personally going to try to organise anything for the summer, but if anyone else does, the floor is open.</p>
<p>Thanks again to everyone, especially Dave and Jon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Quong</title>
		<link>http://publicreason.net/2008/04/26/remarks-on-comments-on-chapter-14-and-a-concluding-note/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Quong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://publicreason.net/2008/04/26/remarks-on-comments-on-chapter-14-and-a-concluding-note/#comment-627</guid>
		<description>Without wanting to signal the end of the reading group, since people (including me!) may have further substantive comments they would like to make, this seems a good place for me to express my thanks.

First, I'd like to thank David for his generous contribution to the group. As Ben (and Simon in another post) have said, it was fantastic to have David as a regular participant, and I think many of us gained a much deeper appreciation of David's theory by having the opportunity to engage directly with him each week.

Second, I'd like to say thanks to all those people who agreed to participate by posting on a chapter when I first broached the idea late last year. This was the first time I've tried to organize anything like this, and I hope that those who contributed found it to be a useful forum.

Thanks again to everyone,
Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without wanting to signal the end of the reading group, since people (including me!) may have further substantive comments they would like to make, this seems a good place for me to express my thanks.</p>
<p>First, I&#8217;d like to thank David for his generous contribution to the group. As Ben (and Simon in another post) have said, it was fantastic to have David as a regular participant, and I think many of us gained a much deeper appreciation of David&#8217;s theory by having the opportunity to engage directly with him each week.</p>
<p>Second, I&#8217;d like to say thanks to all those people who agreed to participate by posting on a chapter when I first broached the idea late last year. This was the first time I&#8217;ve tried to organize anything like this, and I hope that those who contributed found it to be a useful forum.</p>
<p>Thanks again to everyone,<br />
Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Saunders</title>
		<link>http://publicreason.net/2008/04/26/remarks-on-comments-on-chapter-14-and-a-concluding-note/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://publicreason.net/2008/04/26/remarks-on-comments-on-chapter-14-and-a-concluding-note/#comment-625</guid>
		<description>Thanks for being so involved in discussion throughout. I certainly think it helped those of us following to get a better grasp on your theory and, where applicable, what our disagreements are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for being so involved in discussion throughout. I certainly think it helped those of us following to get a better grasp on your theory and, where applicable, what our disagreements are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

